스웨덴의 전설적인 촬영감독 스벤 닉비스트(니크비스트)가 지난달 20일(현지시간)에 사망했다는 소식을 다소 뒤늦게 접했다. 향년 83세이고, 외신에 따르면 그는 치매로 인한 실어증으로 치료받던 한 요양원에서 생을 마감했다 한다. 간략한 부음기사에 따르면, 닉비스트는 거장 잉마르 베리만의 오랜 파트너로 베리만의 작품 <외침과 속삭임>, <화니와 알렉산더>로 각각 1973년과 1982년 두 차례 아카데미 촬영상을 받았다. 베리만 감독과는 1961년부터 30여년간 일했다. 그는 또 루이 말, 우디 앨런, 로만 폴란스키, 안드레이 타르코프스키 등 다른 거장 감독들과도 일했다. 대표작으로는 <희생>, <뉴욕 스토리>, <길버트 그레이프>, <테넌트>, <포스트맨은 벨을 두 번 울린다>, <페르소나> 등이 있다." 그 중에서 나의 관심을 끄는 것은 물론 타르코프스키와 작업한 <희생>(1986)이다. 이 두 사람과 <희생>에 관한 몇 가지 관련자료들을 모아 고인의 삶을 추모하고자 한다. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

씨네21(01. 10. 10) 빛의 관찰자, 혹은 이미지의 모험가
- <처녀의 샘> <희생>의 스벤 닉비스트

“카메라를 들여다보는 순간, 주위에 있는 모든 사람들을 잊게 된다. 렌즈를 통해 눈앞에 펼쳐진 작은 세상 앞에서 비로소 나는 내가 살아있음을 느낀다. 카메라와의 만남은 내게 유일한 즐거움이 되어주었고, 순수한 빛을 갈구하는 나의 노력은 더해갔다.” 감독이 전달하고자 하는 감정과 느낌을 바르게 해석하여 영화의 분위기를 창출해내는 것이 촬영감독의 소임이라 여기던 스웨덴 출신 촬영감독 스벤 닉비스트는 이같은 철저한 자기집중 위에 영화의 삶을 세웠다.



근 30년 동안 그와 작업 해온 잉그마르 베리만은 “영화를 만드는 것은 그립지 않지만, 그와 함께 작업하지 못하는 것이 아쉬울 따름이다”라고 자신의 시각이 되어준 닉비스트를 회상한다. 1998년 <셀리브리티> 촬영을 끝으로 실어증으로 영화계를 은퇴하고, 이제는 초로의 노인으로 묻혀 지내는 스벤 닉비스트의 모습 뒤로 어릴 적 영화에 대한 호기심에 충만한 작은 소년이 오버랩된다. 아프리카에서 선교활동을 하던 아버지는 영화를 보는 것을 죄악으로 여겼고 아들이 영화관에 가는 것을 엄하게 금했다.

그러나 한번 각인된 스크린에 대한 미련은 신문배달을 하여 모은 돈으로 8mm 카메라를 장만하는 열성을 낳았고, 이후 이탈리아의 치네치타 스튜디오에서 촬영기사 생활을 시작으로 한 영화와의 인연은 53년 <톱밥과 금속조각>에서 베리만과의 만남으로 이어진다. 당시 이 둘이 이루어낸 강렬한 색채의 흑백 화면과 빛의 사용은 그 자체가 도전이자 용기를 필요로 하였으며, 평단의 달갑지 않은 시선 또한 감수해야 했다. 그러나 빛에 대한 꾸준한 연구와 실험정신은 모더니즘 영화의 새로운 역사를 써내려갈 반향을 불러일으킨다.

<외침과 속삭임>(1974), <화니와 알렉산더>(1984)로 두번의 아카데미상을 수상한 닉비스트의 화면은 단순함에 그 기반을 둔다. 최소한의 빛과 최소한의 색으로 사실에 가까운 자연스러운 이미지를 창출해낼 수 있다는 믿음은 그의 화면 어디에서도 복잡한 조명이나 필터나 렌즈를 이용한 테크닉을 찾아볼 수 없는 이유이다. <겨울 빛>의 촬영 당시, 실제 교회에서 5분마다 시시각각 바뀌는 빛을 관찰하여 그 빛을 스튜디오에 세운 교회세트에 반영한 일례는 철저하게 빛을 연구하여 자연광의 효과를 내려는 의도를 잘 보여준다. 스웨덴의 음산한 숲에서 전망 좋은 경관에 이르기까지 그가 구가하는 화면은 이미 촬영에 들어가기 몇달 전부터 치밀하게 사고된 빛의 탐구에 연원한다.



유독 배우의 얼굴에 관심을 두는 촬영방식 또한 주목할 만하다. 미디엄 숏을 배제하고 대담하게 클로즈업된 화면에서 배우들의 심리상태는 적나라하게 드러나며, 콘트라스트가 강하고 번쩍거리는 조명 대신 부드럽고도 풍부한 그만의 빛은 인간 영혼의 깊은 곳을 놓치지 않고 포착해낸다. 애정과 관심으로 세밀하게 빚어낸 화면은 함께 작업을 한 배우들이 그와의 작업을 기쁘게 회상하게 만든다.

물론, 베리만과의 강렬한 인상으로 100여편이 넘는 또다른 그의 작품을 간과할 수는 없다. 우디 앨런, 로만 폴란스키, 안드레이 타르코프스키, 필립 카우프만, 리브 울만에 이르기까지 그는 70년대 이후 스웨덴 안팎의 활동을 통해 세계적인 명성을 얻게 된다. 독창적인 영상으로 한번 그와 작업을 한 감독은 또다시 그와의 작업을 기대하였다고 하며, 이는 10여분에 이르는 도입부의 롱테이크가 돋보이는 타르코프스키의 <희생>에서부터 화려한 촬영감각으로 브룩 실즈를 일약 스타덤에 오르게 한 루이 말의 <프리티 베이비>, 쇼비즈니스계의 어두운 이면을 드러내기에 효과적인 흑백화면을 구가한 우디 앨런의 <셀리브리티> 등에서도 잘 나타난다.



최근 그의 유려한 영상세계를 재조명한 다큐멘터리 <잉마르 베리만과 스벤 니크비스트>(Light Keeps Me Company, 2000)가 아들 칼 구스타프 닉비스트에 의해 제작되었으며, 지난해 부산영화제에서 상영되었다. 그간 함께 일해온 동료들의 인터뷰로 조망된 79살 노장의 어깨 위에 걸린 훈장은 휘황찬란한 조명도 세인의 찬사도 아닌, 자연의 빛을 좇아 한길 영화에 바친 구도자의 모습 그대로이다. 소리없는 색채이지만 큰 울림을 자아낼 수 있는 힘, 그건 바로 빛에 대한 사랑이었다.(이화정/ 자유기고가)  

 

 

Sven Nykvist

On the Shooting of The Sacrifice

Source: "Vördnad för ljuset" (In Reverence of Light), by Sven Nykvist and Bengt Forslund. Albert Bonniers Publishing Company, ISBN 91-0-056316-1, © Nykvist/Forslund 1997. The following comprises pages 181–188 of the book (excluding all photographs), taken from the the chapter "From Tarkovskij to Woody Allen." This excerpt translated from Swedish by Trond S Trondsen of Nostalghia.com. It is translated and published here with the kind permission of the authors. A Japanese (re-)translation is provided by Kimitoshi Sato of Japan. The photo below is taken by Lars-Olof Löthwall, and is used with his permission.

  A personal motto of mine is "It is never too late." Many, as they reach the age of sixty start to feel as if they are at the end of themselves, the official retirement age is fast approaching. Thanks and goodbye.

But, those of us who are freelance and rather independent often do not think along those lines. Creativity surely doesn't cease at a certain age. Many artists, composers, authors, and filmmakers are still active will into their eighties - not to mention actors and actresses.

The fact is that I received some of my most exciting assignments, and did some of my best movies, at an age usually associated with retirement. It began with Andrej Tarkovskij's The Sacrifice, 1985, and continued the following year with Philip Kaufman's film adaptation of Milan Kundera's novel The Unbearable Lightness of Being, followed by some years of cooperation with Woody Allen.

I had a great admiration for Tarkovskij (1932-1986) ever since I saw his fresco on the icon painter Andrej Rubljov. It was a true revelation to me when I saw it for the first time. Pure image magic! His exile from the Soviet Union led him, by chance, to Sweden via Italy where he in 1982 did Nostalghia with Erland Josephson in the lead role. They became good friends.

Anna-Lena Wibom of the Swedish Film Institute was also one of his long-time friends. In Cannes in 1984 Tarkovskij was invited to shoot his next film in Sweden. He had several potential film candidates, but in the end the choice fell on The Sacrifice, which was written for Erland Josephson.

My friendship with Erland, combined with Tarkovskij's admiration for Ingmar, resulted in me being asked if I wanted to be the cameraman. It was not a difficult choice at all, in spite of the fact that at the same time I was offered to shoot Out of Africa with Sidney Pollack. Erland and I even invested our artists' fees back into the film and thus became co-producers through our mutual corporation. It was not at all good business, but certain experiences are well worth the money, and, besides, I received a prestigious prize in Cannes for the film.

From a personality point of view, I and Andrej got along very well indeed. We started out by watching each other's movies. His appreciation for Bergman, and mine of his movies, caused us to muse on the many obvious differences. I could see that he obviously was not very interested in lighting. To him, of primary importance were composition, camera movements, the literally moving image.

He was not even interested in the actors. He blamed this on his shyness, combined with language difficulties. The important thing to him became choosing the correct types of people, with a particular kind of look, and to see to it that they had the right way of expressing themselves. Close-ups are also strikingly rare in Tarkovskij's movies. He preferred to see the actors' movements at a distance, almost choreographed, and alway in the center of the frame.

This caused our working relationship to be somewhat strained during the first few weeks of shooting. As opposed to in the case of Ingmar, Tarkovskij had no prior knowledge whatsoever of the location of shooting until he got there and could sit at the camera and plan and direct its movements. This would often take hours.

Add to this, that only when Tarkovskij had made up his mind on how he wanted things, could I come in and set the lighting. And since the shots at hand were more often that not extended tracking shots, things could take an inordinate amount of time. One must deal very carefully with what is only seemingly unchanging exterior lighting. In addition, there were the associated changes in image definition and contrast which the assistant cameraman had to learn to deal with.

But when the images had finally been recorded, there were as a rule a considerable amount of minutes of exposed film in the camera. It was a different way of working and the result bears witness to the fact that one way may be as good as, or better, than another. Great artists go their own ways. And the photographers role is to yield, it is always the director's wisdom that counts - if indeed he knows what he wants.

And Tarkovskij knew what he wanted. He had a scene he had dreamt about doing for a long long time, for ten years, he claimed. It was to be the final scene of The Sacrifice. The main character's house burns down to the ground before his very eyes, he apparently goes insane and is taken away in an ambulance. The entire scene was supposed to be done in one single take while the camera moves along a hundred meter long rail. We had special-effects people brought in from England as there was a requirement in place that the house burn down in eight minutes and ten seconds sharp. Otherwise the film cartridge would run out.

For an entire week this scene was meticulously rehearsed. We had decided to not shoot the scene under sunlit conditions, and so we were forced to get up at two o'clock in the morning, do a few test runs, and then to commence shooting the scene at a carefully selected moment just prior to sunrise.

Approximately half-way through the take, my assistant yells out, "Sven - the camera is losing speed! We got twenty..., now we're at sixteen frames per second! What shall we do?"

Just to be on the safe side, in case problems should arise, I had deployed another camera approximately midway along the rail, so I said, "Swap the cameras!"

Within thirty seconds he had changed the camera and we continued filming. Tarkovskij had not noticed that we had changed camera, nor had the majority of the others. They were all watching the fire, and when it was over and the ambulance had made its exit everybody cheered over the fact that everything had turned out so well.

Then I got to tell about what had happened. Tarkovskij almost cried. The film was immediately developed to see if we in spite of everything could use some of the existing material. But, there was no way. Whatever the case, it was definitely not the sequence Tarkovskij had dreamt about for all these years - and it was even supposed to be the climactic sequence of the movie.

We really didn't have the funds to re-build the house and to do a second take. Long discussions ensued, where even Erland and I were involved in our roles as co-producers. The actors were fortunately still under contract for another while. We received some additional funding through our Japanese co-producer, and in the end we all decided to give it another shot. Nothing is impossible, as Ingmar Bergman was fond of saying. It was his gang behind the camera here. The house was re-built!

This time, however, I requested of Andrej that he agree that we build two sets of rails, and that the shoot should, just to be safe, be be shot simultaneously by the two cameras mounted at slightly different elevations. For an entire day we rehearsed with both cameras to ensure that they both moved in identical manner. We shot the scene one morning when everything seemed just right, but at the same moment Andrej was about to yell "Camera!" the sun appeared.

Tarkovskij shouted, "What shall I do?"

I said, "Look, there's nothing you can do,...! The sun is coming out, the house is already on fire - and we're on our second house!"

Fortunately, it turned out just fantastic. As the smoke billowed forth from the house the sun shone right through it and generated some truly great shading on the ground. It was a lucky strike indeed that the sun appeared - entirely to our advantage, and Tarkovskij was exceedingly pleased when he saw the end result.

While certainly a stubborn perfectionist, he was also willing to be corrected, at least by people that he trusted. It turned out, actually, that he at times was remarkably bound up by what he had once learned at the Russian film school.

I recognized this exact phenomenon from my earlier cooperation with Barabas and Polanski, these also deeply affected by Eastern European film schools, perhaps the best schools in the world, with their much stricter set of ingrained rules than what is commonly found in the western world. At times there were purely practical reasons for such differences. For instance, Barabas and Polanski wanted to do fine tuning of color balance on-the-fly, directly in the camera, as opposed to later in the laboratory, which certainly is better and simpler, but then again the standards of quality at eastern laboratories were hardly the same as in the west. In this case they did yield to my suggestions.

They seem to have been taught that tracking shots should be employed as frequently as possible - I have rarely done as many tracking shots as I did with these three directors - shots which do indeed hold undeniable cinematic value. But in the case of Tarkovskij, the school had taken it so far as to even forbid the use of such a practical tool as the oblique pan.

One of the first images we were to shoot for The Sacrifice was such a shot. We were to pan across from a close-up on a glass of water and then up on Erland Josephson who was sitting at a distance away. Tarkovskij vehemently insisted on first tracking horizontally along the tabletop and subsequently vertically up to Erland, which of course took a much longer time than if we went at an angle up from the glass of water and right on to Erland's face. Only when he saw the alternate take did he admit that this was indeed the better approach.

As a rule, however, it was Tarkovskij's own visions that counted even if he at times had a hard time communicating them, partly due to the language barrier - he had to constantly work through an interpreter - but primarily due to the fact that he first and foremost wanted to communicate emotions, moods, atmosphere. By images, not by words. He wanted to impart a soul to objects and nature. Here he actually went further than Bergman ever did.

Once I understood this, it became a true delight to work with him and we ended up becoming very close friends. He also saw how my lighting had the effect of amplifying his own vision. I remember, among other things, how well we worked together when we after the shooting was completed performed the, to the movie so significant, color reduction in the laboratory. In the same way Ingmar and I did in A Passion, and he himself had done in Nostalghia, we removed from certain scenes almost sixty percent of the color content. A cameraman's work is indeed not done until there is a properly lighted and approved opening-night copy. Good lighting people in a laboratory are invaluable. Nils Melander of Film Teknik has been my great support during all my years of working in Sweden.

This my work on the color reduction on The Sacrifice eventually caused me to meet one of my big director heroes, namely the Japanese Akiro Kurosawa. There were at one time serious plans that he, Fellini, and Ingmar Bergman were to do a period movie together. Ingmar and Fellini met in Rome, but Kurosawa never showed up and in the end the movie never materialized.

Some years after The Sacrifice had been released I received an offer to shoot an industry commercial film in Japan. I had not previously had the opportunity to work there, the job was well-paid, and I saw the opportunity of perhaps running into Kurosawa. So, I took the job.

I am unfortunately a rather shy person, one who does not usually initiate making contact, so when my assignment was all but finished two weeks later, it looked like I would be going home without having met Kurosawa. But, once again, I was in luck. Kurosawa was at that time close to eighty years old (b. 1910) and was about to receive some prestigious national achievement award. A large party was being thrown in his honor. The organizing committee, which had taken notice of the fact that I was in town, actually invited me.

The Sacrifice had, as you know, been a Japanese co-production and the picture had been the object of much attention when it was first screened in Tokyo, which was only shortly prior to my visit. Kurosawa had seen the movie - and lo' and behold suddenly he was the one interested in meeting me! He absolutely wanted to know how we had managed to work out the color reduction.

As soon as we had been introduced to each other he pulled me off into a separate room where we could sit undisturbed during the dinner and discuss color reduction processes. One never forgets such an evening.

I also asked him why he never showed up in Rome. "I was too shy," he said, "Bergman and Fellini are way too big for me."

 

 




필모그래피
<셀리브리티>(Celebrity, 1998) 우디 앨런 감독
<사적인 고백>(Enskilda Samtal, 1996) 리브 울만 감독
<사랑 게임>(Something to Talk About, 1995년) 라세 할스트롬 감독
<라이프세이버>(Mixed Nuts, 1994) 노라 에프런 감독
<온리 유>(Only You, 1994) 노먼 주이슨 감독
<하버드 졸업반>(With Honors, 1994) 알렉 케쉬시안 감독
<길버트 그레이프>(What's Eating Gilbert Grape, 1993) 라세 할스트롬 감독
<시애틀의 잠 못 이루는 밤>(Sleepless In Seattle, 1993) 노라 에프런 감독
<채플린>(Chaplin, 1992) 리처드 애튼버러 감독
<옥스>(Oxen, 1991) 스벤 닉비스트 감독
<뉴욕 스토리>(New York Stories, 1989) 우디 앨런, 프랜시드 포드 코폴라, 마틴 스코시즈 감독
<범죄와 비행>(Crimes and Misdemeanors, 1989) 우디 앨런 감독
<또다른 여인>(Another Woman, 1988) 우디 앨런 감독
<프라하의 봄>(The Unbearable Lightness of Being, 1988) 필립 카우프만 감독
<희생>(Offret, 1986) 안드레이 타르코프스키 감독
<신의 아그네스>(Agnes of God, 1985) 노먼 주이슨 감독
<스완의 사랑>(Un Amour de Swann, 1984) 폴커 슐뢴도르프 감독
<즐거운 농장>(Cannery Row, 1982) 데이비드 S. 워드 감독
<화니와 알렉산더>(Fanny Och Alexander, 1982) 잉마르 베리만 감독
<포스트맨은 벨을 두 번 울린다>(The Postman Always Rings Twice, 1981) 밥 라펠슨 감독
<허리케인>(Hurricane, 1979) Jan Troell 감독
<집시들의 왕>(King Of The Gypsies, 1978) 프랭크 피어슨 감독
<가을 소나타>(Hostsonaten, 1978) 잉마르 베리만 감독
<프리티 베이비>(Pretty Baby, 1978) 루이 말 감독
<테넌트>(Le Locataire, 1976) 로만 폴란스키 감독
<고독한 여심>(Face to Face, 1975) 잉마르 베리만 감독
<마법 피리>(Trollflojten, 1975) 잉마르 베리만 감독
<외침과 속삭임>(Viskningar Och Rop, 1972) 잉마르 베리만 감독
<정열>(En Passion, 1969) 잉마르 베리만 감독
<페르소나>(Persona, 1966) 잉마르 베리만 감독
<겨울 빛>(Nattvardsgasterna, 1963) 잉마르 베리만 감독
<침묵>(Tystnaden, 1963) 잉마르 베리만 감독
<거울을 통해 어렴풋이>(Sasom I En Spegel, 1961) 잉마르 베리만 감독
<처녀의 샘>(Jungfrukallan, 1960) 잉마르 베리만 감독
<톱밥과 금속 조각>(Gycklarnas Afton, 1953) 잉마르 베리만 감독


댓글(0) 먼댓글(0) 좋아요(0)
좋아요
북마크하기찜하기