[퍼온글] It's mutual hatred, stupid

Spiked에서 퍼온 글.

Blecher는 미국 민주당과 공화당 지지자들의 분열과 대립이 단순히 정책적인 이견들에서 나오는 것이 아님을 말하고 있다. 그에 따르면 오늘 미국인들에게 민주당이냐 공화당이냐는 것은 종교적인 차이나 지역적인 요소들보다도 훨씬 중요한 정체성 형성기제로 작용한다는 것이다. 이러한 상황에서 양자는 서로를 반대하는 데 그치지 않는다. 그들은 서로를 증오하고 공포스러워 한다. 타자는 좋게 보아주면 약간 제정신이 아니라고 말할 수 있고 최악의 경우에는 인간이 아니다. Blecher는 이러한 증오와 공포의 밑바닥에는 절망이라는 공유된 감정이 깔려있다고 말한다. 공적이고 사적인 삶에서 그리고 민주주의적 과정에서의 절망. 그들([우리도 아마])은 더이상 문제들이 민주주의적 과정으로 풀려 나갈 수 있을 것이라고 기대하지 않는다. 그러므로 이제 남은 것은 이기는 것 뿐이다. 만일 우리가 좋은 삶을 살 수 없다면 타인들도 그렇게 살 수 없도록 하자.

Blecher의 글은 분명 약간 과장된 것이긴 하지만 현재 미국 내 상황의 일단을 설득력 있게 포착하고 있다. 양극화 현상은 세계 도처에서 가속화되고 있는 듯이 보인다. 그가 느끼는 두려움과 슬픔은 그만의 것이 아니다.

---

Article7 October 2004

It's mutual hatred, stupid
Both Democrats and Republicans are taking their disappointment with politics out on each other.

by George Blecher

Pundits pouring over the latest election polls miss the point that the average American seems to get: polls or no polls, the popular vote is likely to be as close as it was four years ago. Though most American voters describe themselves as 'moderate', psychologically we've hardened into two armed camps of equal strength. In this climate, issues matter far less than allegiances. The Iraq war, the economy, the military records and personalities of the candidates, 9/11 - none of it matters as much as which side you're on.

Seeing ourselves as liberal or conservative has become more central to our identities than our religions or where we live. In a time of virtual rather than actual community, we feel safe with those on our side, threatened by and furious at those on the other side. Actually, we don't even see the other side. At best, they're certifiably insane; at worst, monstrously inhuman.

Two personal examples: four years ago, I heard a well-known conservative intellectual, a speechwriter for President George Bush senior, speak at a university club in New York. She was relaxed and charming, felt that she was among friends and shared not only opinions, but feelings as well. 'At the beginning of the campaign', she said, 'my colleagues and I felt pretty good about [Democratic nominee Al] Gore. We didn't agree with most of what he said, but we could live with that. He seemed like somebody you could talk to. But now we realize that he's just like Clinton - crazy!'. When I told the incident to a friend on the Left, she said: 'Well, I'm not surprised. But I disagree with you on one point: there are no intellectuals on the Right.'

A few months later, I was crossing a snowy Manhattan street with my young son. A van with Jersey plates made a tight turn and missed my son by a couple of inches. I ran after the van and started bawling out the driver, who took one look at my fur hat and designer glasses, rolled down his window and sputtered: 'You, you, you…liberal!'.

We don't merely disagree with each other; we hate and fear each other. What do Republicans hate about Democrats? They're sneaky, compromising, ready to barter away hard-earned money and freedom to win the approval of decadent Europeans and perverse fringe groups. They're effeminate cowards, unwilling to stand up and fight for their beliefs. One of the more popular Republican labels for people on the left - latte-drinking, Volvo-driving liberals - isn't frivolous in the least. A fondness for lattes and Volvos is a nod to the inherently foreign and devious - a latte's very name is Euro-pretentious, to say nothing of its price; and driving a Volvo suggests that one values safety over design, power and speed. Worst of all, Democrats are hypocrites, professing to help the poor and spread the wealth around while making sure that their kids go to the right schools and avoid military service.

All this may be obvious, but what is more subtle is what Republicans fear about Democrats. The look in that van driver's eye was fear, and not just that I might turn him in. He feared that I was of a higher class - which I suppose I was - and therefore had powers that he couldn't imagine. To a great number of Republicans, Democrats have come to represent privilege - the kind of self-righteous, impersonal, abstract pseudo-generosity ready to give away rights that less privileged people have fought hard for.

What do Democrats hate about Republicans? Their stupidity and love of violence, their selfishness, aggressiveness, ruthlessness. Republicans are bullies and cheaters, who'll use any tactic, dirty or not, to get what they want. They're isolationists full of hate and prejudice. You can't reason with them because they regard reasoning as a sign of weakness. They're Mr Hyde to the Democrats' dedicated, humanistic Doctor Jekyll; Id to the Democratic Ego, but not a healthy, sexualised Id. On the contrary, their macho swagger masks grave insecurities about their potency. At heart no Republican has any sense of morality or decency; they're ruled either by greed or fanaticism.

Democrats fear Republicans for much the same reason that their counterparts fear them: they fear their enemy's superior power. High in their corporate offices, Republicans pull the strings of the country. The plebs of the radical right are merely a convenience that the party elite need to get themselves elected and then redirect to hopeless causes, like overturning the Roe v Wade decision on abortion, or passing a Constitutional amendment against same sex marriage.

Underneath the hate and fear, however, I think there's an even more basic - and shared - emotion: disappointment. Disappointment in one's public and private life, and disappointment in the democratic process. Judging by the diminishing number of voters in European elections, it would appear that this disappointment isn't limited to the USA.

Over the past 50 years, the Republican/conservative vision of self-reliance and upward mobility through hard work has been clouded by everything from the complexities of foreign trade to unionism to regulatory agencies to perceived inequities in the educational and welfare systems. The Democratic vision of benevolent centralised government working for equal opportunity has likewise been compromised - by corporate arrogance, lobbyists, and a sense that the gap between rich and poor has grown to unprecedented proportions. Because the solutions to these problems aren't within our grasp - and because to a great extent we have lost faith that the democratic process can work to solve the problems - we've chosen to take it out on each other. Winning has become everything. If we can't live a good life, at least we can make sure that the others don't either.

In November's presidential elections we won't vote for any issue or candidate; we'll vote against those on the other side. As Walt Kelly's cartoon character Pogo put it many years ago: 'We have met the enemy, and he is us.'

George Blecher is based in New York, and reports for a number of European publications about American politics and culture.