Graceling (Paperback)
Cashore, Kristin / Graphia / 2009년 9월
평점 :
장바구니담기


 Well, I don't like stories where the male protagonist becomes disabled. That's why I deducted 1 star.  

 

I think the writer struggled a lot with the "superhuman" female protagonist because we (or at least 'I') have this conventional belief that for a romance to happen, our heroine should fall in love with a man who is (at least slightly) superior to her. (I know i am biased, and I can't help it!)

Haven't we already watched this type in Rochester, a tyrant-turned-disabled hero in Jane Eyre? Reading Jane Eyre and another work by Bronte, Villette, I wondered if maming the male protagonist or making him disappear is the only way for a female author to negotiate her heroine's free will in the choking partriarcal society?  Okay, let's say that was a dilemma more than a century ago.

 

Back to Graceling, if I say that from this superhuman or super-strong heorine, I see  modern women stuck in the same dilemma, am I going too far? Oh, I don't think so. I saw many women still struggling with the delimma (including myself).  It was shocking to see my Canadian flatmate Lorna, who was supposed to be 'radical' as an anthopologist major, still had a strong fantasy about a man's courting - the kneeling down and popping the question stuff. 

In reality, it has been painful to live with two contradicting desires - one to be independent, professional and strong, and the other to project this bugging ego to someone bigger, stronger than me in the bliss of romance. And my romance has always ended up as 'multiple splices' in me, usually hurting the men and hurting myself more.  A 'so-called' feminist wirter in my culture more than a decade ago said that we are waiting for "a prince" waving the banner of feminism. I pretended to be very critical to the statement, but, honsetly,....Damn.....how I was jealous about the girls who were extremly~~~~ lucky to find the prince with the right banner.  

 

Again back to Graceling, well...I am conveniently biased and  I want to see could-have-beens in reality come true in fiction, which means....."Hey, give me the prince, not a man disabled enough to guarantee a female partner's independence, and don't give a shit that, men, when only disabled, are able to 'alllow' women to be independent and have their own way." I want to dismiss fictions that remind me of the reality - It is only the wolves' reality that an alpha female and an alpha male are nicely together; in human reality, alpha males don't want leader females (they just want trophies - beautifully stuffed and comfortably dumb)! Is it too much to expect to see a single man who can 'bear' strong and powerful women while still holding his strength and masculinity intact? Show me such men in fiction; I don't expect to see one living example in reality. So please give me (at least) vicarious satisfaction - That's why I read fictions, not documentaries.

  

Lastly, I don't like a fiction that leaves me in discontent!  

* I ordered the prequel of this novel - Fire



댓글(3) 먼댓글(0) 좋아요(1)
좋아요
공유하기 북마크하기찜하기 thankstoThanksTo
 
 
울프심 2010-08-14 21:39   좋아요 0 | 댓글달기 | URL
모든 남자들이 다 그런 것은 아닙니다..친구여!! 하긴 내가 쥐뿔도 없기 하지만..그리고, 영어로 쓴다고 해도 너의 유머와 기지는 사라지지 않아서 읽는 내내 좋았다. 더 열심히 읽고 쓰기를 바란다...

톡톡캔디 2010-08-15 16:35   좋아요 0 | 댓글달기 | URL
너 땜에 다시 읽어보니까 오타가 수두룩하구나 ㅠ.ㅠ 즉흥적으로 웹에 쓰는 버릇을 어쩔 수가 없어서. 딴 데쓰고 ㅊ퇴고까지 해서 옮겨쓰는 사람들도 있던데, 난 웹에서 그러는 거 싫더라. 그냥 즉흥적인게 좋아서 ㅎㅎ

그리고 모든 남자들이 그렇다고 생각하는 건 아니다. 특히 딸이 셋이나 되는 남자는 안 그렇겠지 ㅋㅋㅋ 딸을 낳고서라도 안 변하면 언제 남자들이 변하겠냐...ㅎㅎ


울프심 2010-08-15 18:32   좋아요 0 | 댓글달기 | URL
글쎄다..딸을 낳았다고 해서 내가 변했나?하고 물어보면 별로 변한 것은 없는 것 같은데...집에서 애들과 애엄마가 한편이 되서 잔소리 하면, 무섭기 하더구만...늙어서 대우 받을려면 잘 하라는 공갈과 협박(?^^)속에 산다...하지만, 요즘 애들은 우리때보다 세상 이치에 밝기 때문에 조금은 걱정은 된다. 왜냐면, 쥐뿔도 없는 아빠라서 그런가보다...딸 셋이라!!! 나도 이럴줄 정말 몰랐는데 어떻게 하다보니 그렇게 됐네...그려...